Open Tcp Port 1025 Blackjack Rating: 6,9/10 7322 reviews
Verify open TCP ports found by local port enumerators: Disabled: When enabled, if a local port enumerator (for example, WMI or netstat) finds a port, the scanner also verifies that the port is open remotely. This approach helps determine if some form of access control is being used (for example, TCP wrappers or a firewall). Blackjack isn't much of a registration:)- that's the 1st port that RPC service will use most times- If you look on the iana's site, you'll see blackjack as 1025, that is a pretty old program, and not typically found on XP- most consider it unregistered, and that is the 1st 'random' port that ms will chose to use as a local port.
Open Tcp Port 1025 Blackjack, italian hotel vegas, valley view casino center seating chart imagine dragons, attack from mars slot. 18+, T&C Apply, New Customers Only. Gamble Responsibly BeGambleAware.org. Permanent Wager: 50x Min deposit: £20- 18+, T&C Apply, New Customers Only. Port 1025 in Windows XP/2K is open by default. It is not network/blackjack even tho most port lists will tell you that it is. It is MSTask.exe that is listening on that port.
I have just run 2 scans at:
http://www.anti-trojan.net/en/onlinecheck.aspx
and the results were as follows:
Port 1025 is open
Applicatons(s): network blackjack, ICQ
Trojans(s): Netspy, Maverick's Matrix, RemoteStorm
Scan complete!
356 ports scanned
1 open ports found
This was the result whether FW was disabled or not(i disabled 1st time as advised for a true result acc. to antitrojan site). A second scan I am using Sygate Firewall Pro, and in order to perform the scan I unchecked the box in the options to block attacker for 600 seconds, but left FW running.
I am using Win2k(SP4). Have NAV 2002 updated, no virus' showed up.
Is this a problem with the FW?, and if not is there a way to block this port using advanced options/rules in Sygate?
http://www.anti-trojan.net/en/onlinecheck.aspx
and the results were as follows:
Port 1025 is open
Applicatons(s): network blackjack, ICQ
Trojans(s): Netspy, Maverick's Matrix, RemoteStorm
Scan complete!
356 ports scanned
1 open ports found
This was the result whether FW was disabled or not(i disabled 1st time as advised for a true result acc. to antitrojan site). A second scan I am using Sygate Firewall Pro, and in order to perform the scan I unchecked the box in the options to block attacker for 600 seconds, but left FW running.
I am using Win2k(SP4). Have NAV 2002 updated, no virus' showed up.
Is this a problem with the FW?, and if not is there a way to block this port using advanced options/rules in Sygate?
Check Tcp Port Open
Is this anything to worry about?
As of now, I have 10 megs of the following logs, and still climbing.
Jun 7 22:28:21 paradox kernel: [IPTABLES DROP] : IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:05:5d:80:e8:92:00:04:5a:26:6d:b3:08:00 SRC=207.69.200.211 DST=192.168.1.201 LEN=195 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=51 ID=20057 PROTO=UDP SPT=53 DPT=1025 LEN=175
Jun 7 22:28:26 paradox kernel: [IPTABLES DROP] : IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:05:5d:80:e8:92:00:04:5a:26:6d:b3:08:00 SRC=207.69.200.210 DST=192.168.1.201 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=51 ID=9575 PROTO=UDP SPT=53 DPT=1025 LEN=20
I have no idea of what they’re trying to do, but UDP ports 53 and 1025 (blackjack) seem to be of interest. The kicker is, these ports are not open on my router, so how are they seeping through, and why? I recently setup a caching name-server, which uses port 53, but again, I don’t have that port open on the outside.
Iptables is dropping the packets, but that because I’ve blocked their class C. My question is, are they somehow using my name server, or is this type of probe common? Should I close off these ports, and how?
Thanks,
Dave H
As of now, I have 10 megs of the following logs, and still climbing.
Jun 7 22:28:21 paradox kernel: [IPTABLES DROP] : IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:05:5d:80:e8:92:00:04:5a:26:6d:b3:08:00 SRC=207.69.200.211 DST=192.168.1.201 LEN=195 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=51 ID=20057 PROTO=UDP SPT=53 DPT=1025 LEN=175
Jun 7 22:28:26 paradox kernel: [IPTABLES DROP] : IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:05:5d:80:e8:92:00:04:5a:26:6d:b3:08:00 SRC=207.69.200.210 DST=192.168.1.201 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=51 ID=9575 PROTO=UDP SPT=53 DPT=1025 LEN=20
I have no idea of what they’re trying to do, but UDP ports 53 and 1025 (blackjack) seem to be of interest. The kicker is, these ports are not open on my router, so how are they seeping through, and why? I recently setup a caching name-server, which uses port 53, but again, I don’t have that port open on the outside.
Iptables is dropping the packets, but that because I’ve blocked their class C. My question is, are they somehow using my name server, or is this type of probe common? Should I close off these ports, and how?
Thanks,
Dave H